Best med spa software in 2026
An honest look at the six platforms aesthetic clinics compare most — who each is built for, what they do well, and where they fall short.
Gracero
Our pickThe all-in-one for aesthetic & wellness clinics
Best for: Med spas, IV therapy, TRT, weight loss, laser, and body sculpting clinics that want booking, payments, memberships, and the aesthetic layer in one platform.
Pricing: Fair & flat — everything included
Strengths
- All-in-one: booking, payments, memberships, CRM, marketing
- Aesthetic layer built in: consent, charting, before-&-after photos
- Modern interface, fast, easy to learn
- Fair, transparent pricing — no surprise add-ons
- Easy migration from competitors
Weaknesses
- Newer to market (smaller install base — growing)
- Not a full medical EMR (by design)
Boulevard
Premium booking & payments for salons and spas
Best for: High-end salons and spas with budget for a premium tool. Strong design, good booking.
Pricing: Premium — per-location fees, add-on charges
Gracero vs BoulevardStrengths
- Polished, modern interface
- Strong booking and payments
- Good client experience
Weaknesses
- Premium pricing that escalates with growth
- Aesthetic features (consent, photos) are add-ons or missing
- No treatment charting (Botox units, filler ml)
Mangomint
Clean scheduling for salons and spas
Best for: Hair salons, day spas, and single-location service businesses that want clean, modern scheduling.
Pricing: Tiered — reasonable for salons
Gracero vs MangomintStrengths
- Clean, modern UI
- Good booking and calendar
- Solid for salon workflows
Weaknesses
- No consent forms or treatment charting
- No before-&-after photos
- Built for salons, not aesthetic clinics
AestheticRecord
Charting and consent for aesthetic practices
Best for: Aesthetic practices that prioritize charting and consent above all else, and don't mind a dated interface.
Pricing: Add-on model — costs stack up
Gracero vs AestheticRecordStrengths
- Strong consent and charting features
- Before-&-after photo galleries
- Built for aesthetic treatments specifically
Weaknesses
- Dated, clunky interface
- Weak on booking, payments, and memberships
- Requires separate tools for the full business stack
Vagaro
Affordable booking for salons, spas, and fitness
Best for: Budget-conscious salons, nail studios, and fitness businesses. Wide feature set at a low price — but built for salons, not clinics.
Pricing: Low base — but not built for clinical work
Gracero vs VagaroStrengths
- Low starting price
- Wide feature set
- Large marketplace
Weaknesses
- No consent forms, charting, or before-&-after photos
- Cluttered interface — too many features for most clinics
- Built for salons and gyms, not aesthetic clinics
Mindbody
Fitness and wellness marketplace platform
Best for: Yoga studios, gyms, and large wellness chains that want marketplace discovery and class scheduling.
Pricing: Enterprise pricing — expensive for small clinics
Gracero vs MindbodyStrengths
- Large consumer marketplace
- Strong class and appointment scheduling
- Enterprise-grade for large chains
Weaknesses
- No consent, charting, or aesthetic features
- Complex, bloated interface
- Expensive — built for fitness chains, not independent clinics
Want to see how Gracero compares?
A 15-minute demo — see booking, payments, memberships, and the aesthetic layer all working together.
Book a demoEverything you're wondering.
See Gracero run your clinic.
A 15-minute demo: booking, payments, memberships, and the aesthetic layer, all in one platform.
Book a demo